Talking Points for
“Relatively Einstein” PowerPoint
In
1905, Albert Einstein wrote his legendary articles which provided the basis of
three fundamental fields in physics:
1)
The
theory of relativity
2)
Quantum
theory
3)
The
theory of Brownian motion
Ten years later, he published his General Theory
of Relativity, reconciling gravity with the modern perspective.
Note
the symbol chosen for the World Year of Physics – its origin will become
apparent later (Slide 3).
Note
that Einstein did not receive the Nobel Prize for his work in
relativity. At the time, it was
controversial and not as appreciated as his work on the photoelectric effect.
Note
that the phrase “the speed of light is constant” does not mean that
light never changes speed! What it does
mean is that two independent observers (even two that are traveling at
different velocities) will measure the same speed for all beams of light. This is one of the few measurements they will
actually agree on.
An
inertial frame is one that is not accelerating.
Thinking about the more generalized case of accelerating frames of
reference led Einstein to his General Theory of Relativity years later.
Suggested
Question: Ask the students how fast they are traveling
right now. Students should realize that
almost any answer is acceptable as long as they have specified their speed
relative to something specific, e.g., the floor of the room, the center of the
earth, the sun, the center of our galaxy, a car on the highway, etc.
The
graphic is an example of a light cone in a space-time diagram. Time is the z-axis, and the three
spatial coordinates have been collapsed into x and y. The yellow cone contains all the possible
future events and past events for someone at the center. The rest of space-time can have no effect nor
can be affected by the person at the center.
Note that an event in this diagram is at a specific place and time. In relativity, our universe is four dimensional
(x , y, z, t)
Demo: If you are connected to the web, this link
will take you to an applet that shows a single light source propagating
outwards from the center. From the
cart’s point of view (and yours), the light reaches both ends
simultaneously. However, once the cart
is in motion (click on the bar in the middle), you will no longer agree that
the events are simultaneous. However,
the person on the cart will still see the same thing as before, since light travels
at the same speed relative to him as it does to you.
Suggested
Question: What happens to gamma in the limit of v
much less than c (v << c)? What about v very close to c (v
»
c)?
This
question is meant to bring up the issue of correspondence: new theories should give us the classical
results in the classical limit. If v
<< c, then gamma is basically one and there is no time dilation or
length contraction. At the limit of v = c, time stops and length
along the velocity direction disappears.
(Note that the other two directions perpendicular to the velocity vector
are unaffected.)
Suggested
Question: What happens to gamma if v > c? (Gamma becomes an imaginary number; thus,
this case is not physically possible.)
Note
that L0 and T0 are called the “rest length”
and “rest time” (or “proper length” and “proper time”) since these are the
lengths and times as measured in the object’s own inertial reference frame.
For
advanced students, a quick illustration of the binomial theorem on the
denominator will illustrate explicitly that the first two terms in the
expansion are the rest energy (or mass energy) and the classical kinetic
energy:

“Extraordinary
claims require extraordinary proofs.” – Carl Sagan
Relativity
Theory is better tested than Newtonian Mechanics precisely because it is so
counter-intuitive.
Although
the Michelson-Morley experiment predates SR and is cited as the definitive
proof for dispelling the notion of the “ether” (the mysterious medium pervading
the universe in which light waves are a disturbance), it can now be seen as
proof that the speed of light is independent of its source. The interferometer was the most accurate way
to measure the speed of light at the time, and by orienting the device in
different directions on Earth, one would obtain the speed of light to be
constant (despite the known fact that the Earth has its own motion relative to
the universe). The interferometer allows
the experimenter to count the interference fringes that go by as the path
length of one of the paths L is changed by a known amount. Given the frequency of the source light and
calculating the exact wavelength (path length change divided by the number of
interference fringes), one can determine the velocity of light.
There are two classic experiments that first
demonstrated time dilation. In the
first, two atomic clocks were flows around the world in opposite directions and
compared to one left on the ground.
Although they were previously synchronized, the clocks in motion were
behind the stationary one by an amount predicted by the relativity theories. The experiment was dependent on the invention
of atomic clocks precise enough to show the small amounts of time dilation
predicted by the theories.
In
the second demonstration: muons are unstable subatomic particle that decay
quickly into other particles. When a
cosmic shower strikes the Earth’s atmosphere, extremely fast muons are created,
and their half-lives were shown to be longer (red line) than that of laboratory
muons (green line) by exactly the Special Relativistic time dilation factor
gamma.
Last
slide on SR. Synchrotron radiation
happens whenever a charged particle travels in a magnetic field. The magnetic field causes the charged
particle to spiral. In radio astronomy,
specifically oriented, regular flashes of light are frequently seen due to
near-light-speed electrons spiraling in large cosmic magnetic fields.
Note
that the classical spherical radiative pattern on the left (slow electron) is
distorted by the length contraction and time dilation indicated on the right
(fast electron).
Try
rephrasing this notion using the question, “What experiment could you do inside
of a windowless lab to tell the difference between the picture on the left and
the one on the right?” Einstein’s
answer: no such experiment exists. (In
this case, we are ignoring the rotation of the Earth, which of course can be
detected; we are concerned with the downward pull of gravity only.)
Almost everyone will see
that Observer A will find that the light hits lower on the opposite wall due to
the box accelerating up while the light travels in a “straight line path”. The same must be true for Observer B since
they are equivalent, and the GR explanation is that the Earth has bent the
space-time lines such that the light is still following a ‘straight’ path
according to the warped space lines; we, however, see the light as bent because
space itself is bent.
Why is the bending caused by both “mass and
energy”? From SR, Einstein showed E=mc2
demonstrating that mass and energy are two forms of the same thing. Therefore, energy has all the same space-time
distorting effects that mass has!
Looking
at the bottom graph, imagine the sun is sitting at the center of the
depression. Now imagine the Earth being
a ball that is rolled towards the depression, but not directly towards it. The circular motion of the ball going around
and around is the orbit of the Earth.
Suggested
Question: Why was the signal strength reduced by 1/D4
for the fourth test when radiation usually falls off as 1/D2 ? (There is a 1/D2 loss going out to
the planet times a 1/D2 loss coming back to Earth.)
Suggested
Question: Are the satellite clocks running too slow or
too fast according to SR and GR? (Due to
SR, they are running slow. Due to GR,
they are running fast. Combining the
two, the net result is that they are running 38 microseconds faster per day.)